Archive for April, 2008

Gather ’round the table. There is music to be made.

The reaTable is a table-top electronic music intstrument was created by a team of developers at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain. The instrument works by allowing physical objects to take on the roles of various modular synthesizer components on a luminous table surface. Single or multiple users can control generators, filters and modulators to collaborate on original electronic compositions on the fly.

See it in action during Bjork’s set during the song Pluto during the 2007 Coachella music festival:

Thanks to Cam at Mediatech for the sweet video find.

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

Negative Feedback

Dr. Joshua Reiss at the Centre for Digital Music at Queen Mary, University of London, has developed a device that allows live sound engineers to identify the levels of various frequencies that cause feedback during initial sound checks and automatically adjusts the master volume to squash any squeeling during the live audio performance. In the latest saga of engineer vs. musician, the engineer’s dream of monitoring the board without the anxiety of the ear piercing feedback may be the the one thing feared by some of the world’s most notorious rockers.

While Reiss’ does not intend for the device to clean up the music, but rather to allow engineers more advanced control during the mix that will achieve the best sound for what the musician wants. James Randerson lets Andy Quibb, professional sound for Björk, weighs in his thoughts in an article published in The Guardian.

“That’s wonderful until the pub starts filling up. Because sweaty bodies absorb certain frequencies and not others the software will not be able to react. “It has its uses, but they are fairly limited … in terms of trying to achieve professional results, it is certainly not a professional tool.”

Mind you, the device and software are still in development. It may be too early to speculate on the potential professional applications that can result once the technology is adapted for the commercial marketplace. But what do you think? Is it wrong to want for technology that makes the job of an engineering easier to manage? I wouldn’t dare to suggest that the featured be applied to every board in the land, especially those owned by venue owners that would switch it on and keep it going without a care for bands that use feedback as a signature party of their sound. But for musicians in select genre’s (i’m looking at you pop singers), would you prefer that your engineer activate the safety button on the sound board?

Before you answer, check out former Jesus and Mary Chain member John Moore’s negative feedback on the subject:

Well Dr Reiss, what’s wrong with a bit of feedback I should like to know? It was good enough for us, it should be good enough for our children. Don’t deprive them of the sensory thrill of staggering into the street following a six-string ear syringing, unable to hear anything but tinnitus for the next three days.

What are your thoughts? Do you want it? Would you use it? Is it cheating? Leave them in the comments below.

Thursday, April 17th, 2008